[Hedge] git patch

[Field, Scott]

OK. After I have everything working I'll add some info to the wiki about
this.

I guess I'll have to do such things as

1) add pyvisfile to subprojects
2) clean/develop with repotool
3) Should I be removing the project pylo as well?

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Andreas Kloeckner
<lists at informa.tiker.net>wrote:

> Hi Scott,
>
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:05:58 -0400, "Field, Scott" <scott_field at brown.edu>
> wrote:
> >    I was about to send off the updated review, and when I grabbed staging
> I
> > noticed vtk.py was deleted.  This is causing some conflicts, so before
> > merging staging with my active branch I wanted to double check that
> vtk.py
> > is supposed to be deleted.
>
> Yes, that was indeed intentional. The background to that is that I'm
> using that vtk file writing functionality in my new project as well, so
> I moved it out of hedge and into a more central location. That central
> location is 'pyvisfile', which is also the new home for what used to be
> 'pylo' (as pyvisfile.vtk and pyvisfile.silo respectively).
>
> http://git.tiker.net/pyvisfile.git
>
> In other words, if you clone pyvisfile as
>
> git clone http://git.tiker.net/trees/pyvisfile.git
>
> you should be fine. Pylo on the other hand is obsolete and can be
> deleted, having been subsumed into PyVisfile.
>
> Andreas
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tiker.net/pipermail/hedge/attachments/20101106/75793b49/attachment.html>