[Pyublas] Is this thing on?

[Andreas Klöckner]

On Mittwoch 21 Januar 2009, Neal Becker wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Andreas Klöckner wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 21 Januar 2009, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > Very quiet on this list lately.  Anything new?
> >
> > Not really--For me, PyUblas is doing the job it was designed for. That's
> > not necessarily bad. :)
> >
> > Andreas
>
> Any thoughts on my proposed unification of strided/non-strided vectors?

As I said in my last email on the subject, I would like to retain PyUblas's 
ability to accept any-shape arrays with arbitrarily funky slicing. I am aware 
that the iterators presently don't make useful guarantees for these types of 
arrays, but being able to accept them at all is a plus regardless.

Unfortunately, Ublas's stride capabilities are too poor to fulfill this 
requirement, so I don't see a good way of unifying strided/unstrided with only 
its help.

IMO, the right solution would be to implement an iterator that understands 
NumPy's memory layout accurately. It's ok for this iterator to be bi-di (or 
even only forward) for now.

Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.tiker.net/pipermail/pyublas/attachments/20090121/e5a13f00/attachment.pgp>