[Pyublas] Is this thing on?
lists at informa.tiker.net
Wed Jan 21 07:38:52 PST 2009
On Mittwoch 21 Januar 2009, Neal Becker wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Andreas Klöckner wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 21 Januar 2009, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > Very quiet on this list lately. Anything new?
> > Not really--For me, PyUblas is doing the job it was designed for. That's
> > not necessarily bad. :)
> > Andreas
> Any thoughts on my proposed unification of strided/non-strided vectors?
As I said in my last email on the subject, I would like to retain PyUblas's
ability to accept any-shape arrays with arbitrarily funky slicing. I am aware
that the iterators presently don't make useful guarantees for these types of
arrays, but being able to accept them at all is a plus regardless.
Unfortunately, Ublas's stride capabilities are too poor to fulfill this
requirement, so I don't see a good way of unifying strided/unstrided with only
IMO, the right solution would be to implement an iterator that understands
NumPy's memory layout accurately. It's ok for this iterator to be bi-di (or
even only forward) for now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Pyublas