On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:20:28 -0400, Rick Gerkin <rickg(a)cmu.edu> wrote:
> > For the latter, all dependencies are 64-bit
> > libraries except for MSVCR90.dll, MSVCP90.dll, the boost_python dll
> > mentioned above, python26.dll, and the _cl.pyd I am examining. For the
> > step in getting this to work, I don't what of all this is relevant.
> > I abandon trying to make it work in a 64-bit OS? Has anyone ever made it
> > work in 64-bit Windows?
> I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here--which ones are
> 64-bit, and which ones are 32? Wouldn't they all need to be 64-bit?
OK, you're probably right that they should all be 64-bit. I imagine I can
find 64-bit version of each of them, except _CL.pyd. I don't know why the
pyOpenCl build script didn't try to build me a 64-bit version. Maybe it was
just matching the bit-depth of its immediate dependencies (e.g.
Python26.dll, BoostPython-VC90-MT-1.43.dll). Perhaps I should work from the
bottom and try to get/build 64-bit dll's all the way up. Is it known
whether anyone has built a 64-bit _CL.pyd in Windows?
As far as I know, the PyOpenCL build will try to match the Python
interpreter with which it is being built.