Dnia 2015-09-08, wto o godzinie 15:22 -0500, Andreas Kloeckner pisze:
Tomasz Rybak <tomasz.rybak(a)post.pl> writes:
> As I'm not using PyOpenCL every day, I abstained from vote.
> But - what's the result? If there was such a change, I'd like
> to describe it in Debian package changelog to warn users.
The complex numbers support was changed as described, since I didn't
hear loud objections. I think this change, while incompatible, is
overall a win because it turned up a number of subtle bugs in my code
that were hidden by the vector nature of the prior complex number
OK, thanks for information - I've added note about this change
to Debian.NEWS; it'll be displayed to users when they update PyOpenCL.
Tomasz Rybak GPG/PGP key ID: 2AD5 9860
Fingerprint A481 824E 7DD3 9C0E C40A 488E C654 FB33 2AD5 9860